From -3723349613729570098 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,24c0140d54165625 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: Francis Glassborow Subject: Re: a question about temporary exception object Date: 1998/11/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 409155427 Approved: stephen.clamage@sun.com (comp.std.c++) References: <3642A62C.CF2FC315@ccnet.com> X-UID: 0000000001 X-Status: $$$T Organization: Southfield Microcomputer SS Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Francis Glassborow Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Originator: clamage@taumet In article <3642A62C.CF2FC315@ccnet.com>, Gilbert Chang writes >I experimented with VC++6.0. In both cases, the constructor was called >once, but the destructor was called twice. Did I do something wrong or >is the compiler simply broken? Did you instrument the copy ctor? (because forgetting that is the commonest cause for an apparent mismatch between documented ctors and dtors) Francis Glassborow Chair of Association of C & C++ Users 64 Southfield Rd Oxford OX4 1PA +44(0)1865 246490 All opinions are mine and do not represent those of any organisation [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]