From -6217871565872982189 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,839fa42e97baea86 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: Pete Becker Subject: Re: Placement new[] Compiler Depenent? Date: 1998/11/21 Message-ID: <3655EFAF.A704C83@acm.org>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 414124073 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Approved: Fergus Henderson References: <3653144D.8A863861@acm.org> <365395A5.CABB481B@acm.org> X-Original-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 17:39:43 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: news@news.unimelb.edu.au X-Trace: izvestia.its.unimelb.edu.au 911628181 32711 128.250.29.16 (21 Nov 1998 06:03:01 GMT) Organization: Northeast Region--MediaOne X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUANlZXieEDnX0m9pzZAQG89AGAl+gtJxNZzjCC8uZC7cU8pN68TQWDQc/Q CNE2xF9mtrGRRLPWdtxiM3GcoPy+rTB3 =U0E+ Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Nov 1998 06:03:01 GMT Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Larry Brasfield wrote: > > I suspect, from your mention of operator new[](size_t) > above when operator new[](size_t, void *) is the topic > of this discussion, that you have no real disagreement > with Mr. Walter's or my perception of the problem. Sure I do. You guys should have been talking about array new, not placement new, like I was. -- Pete Becker Dinkumware, Ltd. http://www.dinkumware.com --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]