From 1233181714962572347 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,6a6f94bb32695be6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: Valentin Bonnard Subject: Unique names (Was: Re: lambda functions proposal) #2 Date: 1998/11/29 Message-ID: <3660DF99.1C06@pratique.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 416875212 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: brick.ens.fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Approved: stephen.clamage@sun.com (comp.std.c++) References: <365994e6.0@10.1.1.65> <365BC26D.E90B8B5A@physik.tu-muenchen.de> <365D5315.33E2DD16@physik.tu-muenchen.de> <73k6fl$cr7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris, France Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Originator: clamage@taumet James.Kanze@dresdner-bank.de wrote: > So what do they do? I have just reported two egcs bugs so ignore my previous message about how egcs does it: egcs simply gets it wrong. However, I have found a solution: use the signature of the first extern non inline function definition; if there isn't one, discard the TU, and document this behaviour. -- Valentin Bonnard mailto:bonnardv@pratique.fr info about C++/a propos du C++: http://pages.pratique.fr/~bonnardv/ [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]