From 5066631624230316751
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,d39f22391071c878
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
From: Miniussi <miniussi@ilog.fr>
Subject: Re: It was in Algol60, but missing in STL
Date: 1999/03/15
Message-ID: <36ED3B61.98617990@ilog.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 455301439
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>
References: <7ciumk$ksk$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Original-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 17:54:57 +0100
X-Accept-Language: fr-FR, en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: news@news.unimelb.edu.au
X-Trace: izvestia.its.unimelb.edu.au 921521722 6135 128.250.29.17 (15 Mar 1999 18:15:22 GMT)
Organization: ILOG S.A.
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUANu1OIeEDnX0m9pzZAQEBdQF+Ky1uH77Bhe/YjR1bJZAbDsNWMY9VkD5S zkVmeZibg6vqurKPLS9yL3WbJqWkqpMU =XkD3
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Mar 1999 18:15:22 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++

Alex Vinokur wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> [...]
> I don't ask why arrays with various boundaries are missing in C/C++.
> But why are they missing in STL?
First, they are not in the STL, does not mean they are "missing". 

> It was in Algol60.
So what ?

I mean, you can't just require to put something in the STL just because
it was in Algol 60 ?

Anyway, such a class can be developped as a wrapper, I don't think it
meets the requirement of the standard lib (explained in the "C++ PL" 
3rd ed, chapter 16).

Alain
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html              ]



