From -5400433932578349005 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,fb1a92fa405c930c X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) Subject: Re: nested functions Date: 1999/06/26 Message-ID: <7l24m6$k1t$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 494213730 Approved: Valentin Bonnard References: <7jd4c5$nup$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jjjr6$r02$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jma5c$i85@abyss.West.Sun.COM> <7jrpss$ogk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37659D89.565ACF7D@technologist.com> <3772A736.559EB26B@tribble.com> X-Original-Date: 26 Jun 1999 08:57:42 GMT Organization: Computer Science, The University of Melbourne X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBVAwUAN3UpzqwEuYhIxRhxAQEcgQH+LNxA6U81wSiNzvLSggBQy1he0KfIHQSa ZD3VAxawR9IicXL1K2iEvHQ7vlDNkKauG6BYec1EBJI46WyV0mzgEQ== =Ho/F Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ David R Tribble writes: >I'm not convinced that trampolines can be implemented in all C++ >implementations. Which part of my explanation did you find unconvincing? If you were to say that implementing trampolines might be complex or difficult, then I won't argue with you. Implementing trampolines is a non-trivial task, and whether or not the benefits are sufficient to justify the additional implementation complexity is certainly debatable. But if you say that it can't be done, then I must refer you to my previous explanation of how it can be done, and ask you which part of it you did not believe or did not understand. -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp. --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]