From -2128133758960140869 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,b2ee37ea6b4e52ab X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: David R Tribble Subject: Re: ISO vs ANSI C++ Date: 1999/07/15 Message-ID: <378CEC3E.A2D80B88@tribble.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 501143887 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Approved: Fergus Henderson References: <7m5mhs$ib0$1@gxsn.com> <3787CF9B.B1053375@acm.org> X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:59:58 -0500 X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: news@news.unimelb.edu.au X-Trace: izvestia.its.unimelb.edu.au 932000305 15252 128.250.29.16 (15 Jul 1999 00:58:25 GMT) Organization: The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUAN40yJeEDnX0m9pzZAQF1cgF+JZpd0c2pUzfGrzCaNc+UB4yYpUkic4Cc sVOqkRhHYe11NGFCeIsed2H2fiyQk6U1 =11UI Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Jul 1999 00:58:25 GMT Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Pete Becker wrote: > > Paul Baxter wrote: >> As I understand it, the C++ standard has been accepted by ISO. >> Is the SAME standard to be ratified by ANSI (or is this even >> needed?) >> They valued stability of the standard as paramount, and were trying >> to use this against C++. > > They sound desparate. disparate? desperate? Both? -- David R. Tribble, david@tribble.com -- --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]