From 3677465364466555063 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,b2ee37ea6b4e52ab X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: "Darin Adler" Subject: Re: ISO vs ANSI C++ Date: 1999/07/11 Message-ID: <7m95lp$1idt@enews4.newsguy.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 500684242 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: news.newsdawg.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Approved: stephen.clamage@sun.com (comp.std.c++) References: <7m5mhs$ib0$1@gxsn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Originator: clamage@taumet "Paul Baxter" wrote: > As I understand it, the C++ standard has been accepted by ISO. > > Is the SAME standard to be ratified by ANSI (or is this even needed?) The ISO C++ standard (ISO/IEC 14882) was approved by ANSI as an American National Standard on 7/27/98, according to the cover page of my copy of the standard. So the standard was "ratified by ANSI" a year ago. -- Darin [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]