From 8549494738326066887
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,b2ee37ea6b4e52ab
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
From: Pete Becker <petebecker@acm.org>
Subject: Re: ISO vs ANSI C++
Date: 1999/07/11
Message-ID: <3787CF9B.B1053375@acm.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 500684228
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.128.201.83
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: stephen.clamage@sun.com (comp.std.c++)
References: <7m5mhs$ib0$1@gxsn.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mediaone.net
X-Trace: wbnws01.ne.mediaone.net 931647347 24.128.201.83 (Sat, 10 Jul 1999 18:55:47 EDT)
Organization: Road Runner
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 18:55:47 EDT
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Originator: clamage@taumet


Paul Baxter wrote:
> 
> As I understand it, the C++ standard has been accepted by ISO.
> 
> Is the SAME standard to be ratified by ANSI (or is this even needed?)

My understanding is that it's not needed.

> 
> I ask because of a few curious comments made at a recent meeting where some
> programmers at a customers site believed that a
> 'final' (for the next few years anyway) standard although agreed by one
> organisation hadn't been agreed by 'others' and that further changes might
> be likely.

They're probably thinking of what happened with the C standard, which
was created by ANSI and changed a bit by ISO. The C++ standard was
developed under a new procedure, with both groups working together. This
meant, for example, that formal votes had to be taken twice: once for
ANSI members to advise our ISO representative on the US position on the
issue, and a second time for the official ISO vote.

> 
> They valued stability of the standard as paramount, and were trying to use
> this against C++.

They sound desparate. <g>

> Personally I'm happy with an ISO standard but didn't feel
> I could refute their claims without some more specific knowledge.
> 
> I'm somewhat confused and wish to know simply whether the new ISO standard
> *IS* the current world-wide standard that (hopefully) compilers will strive
> for, or are the posts going to be moved in the next year or so with a
> slightly modified ANSI standard?

It's official and worldwide.

-- 
Pete Becker
Dinkumware, Ltd.
http://www.dinkumware.com


[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html              ]




