From -2730340761449804926 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,b2ee37ea6b4e52ab X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: Valentin Bonnard Subject: Re: ISO vs ANSI C++ Date: 1999/07/16 Message-ID: <378E6721.2858@wanadoo.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 501618175 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Approved: Fergus Henderson References: <7m5mhs$ib0$1@gxsn.com> <3788dece.3064835@nntp.netcom.ca> <7mitn0$dch@library2.airnews.net> <7ml0ep$jlq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:56:33 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: news@news.unimelb.edu.au X-Trace: izvestia.its.unimelb.edu.au 932102549 22609 128.250.29.16 (16 Jul 1999 05:22:29 GMT) Organization: Ecole normale superieure X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUAN47BieEDnX0m9pzZAQFFggF/bjrRRsNkLAIMjqxQXiSqAQQyzZBALj3m MXQZ3UkgHRfleY2pfY6B+A89Jmhp0WND =vjEy Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Jul 1999 05:22:29 GMT Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ James.Kanze@dresdner-bank.com wrote: > And it would require a change in at > least one implementation. Would ISO accept this? As I understand it, breaking every implementation is _not_ an argument against making something a defect as opposed to a new feature. -- Valentin Bonnard --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]