From -7065977615532041629 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,a7bb6560624ae2c1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: Francis Glassborow Subject: Re: More M$ Not Conforming points... Date: 1999/08/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 517130849 Approved: Fergus Henderson References: <7ps1sg$dev$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7pu4es$1mv3$1@news.hal-pc.org> X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:05:58 +0100 X-Complaints-To: news@news.unimelb.edu.au X-Trace: izvestia.its.unimelb.edu.au 935607829 1669 128.250.29.17 (25 Aug 1999 19:03:49 GMT) Organization: Southfield Microcomputer SS X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUAN8Q9/+EDnX0m9pzZAQGFGAF9E5TR/64jf8xiJjbx22fSixAGr8li7orD 1NRWnizTuDSjEEWB0RVlU6Qalo91/K1Y =OlLg Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Francis Glassborow NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Aug 1999 19:03:49 GMT Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ In article <7pu4es$1mv3$1@news.hal-pc.org>, Greg Brewer writes >This warning is no different than any other function without a return. I >think you will find that if you change it to > void main(void) {} >it will compile without any complaints. Of course, but it will not be conforming C++. Francis Glassborow Journal Editor, Association of C & C++ Users 64 Southfield Rd Oxford OX4 1PA +44(0)1865 246490 All opinions are mine and do not represent those of any organisation --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]