From -4601360086803567857 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,fbd36da46c3cc7a0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: "James Kuyper Jr." Subject: Re: Discussion: type_info Date: 1999/11/26 Message-ID: <383C81FC.C9ACD7E@wizard.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 553253490 Approved: Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <81ecdl$pq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en,de,es,ru X-Relay-IP: 128.250.1.22 X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: typ12.nn.bcandid.com 943489457 206.161.15.49 (Wed, 24 Nov 1999 19:24:17 EST) Organization: Not Enough X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 19:24:17 EST Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Scott Meyers wrote: .... > Just for the record, I don't think it's out for the design I sketch in > the MEC++ errata, because it's okay to specialize less for > pair, which is the type I propose > putting into the map. That is, I agree that you can't specialize std::less > for a pointer type, but I believe you can specialize it for a std::pair > containing pointer types. 17.4.3.1 p1: "... Such a specialization ... results in undefined behavior unless the declaration depends on a user-defined name of external linkage ..." I didn't see any user-defined names in your example. --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]