From 8701832039574427250 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f78e5,ccbfcafab96cf493 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-30 11:28:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Valentin.Bonnard@free.fr (Valentin Bonnard) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Proposol to increase robustness of programs Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:27:51 GMT Approved: Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++ Message-ID: <200111300634.HAA04435@brick.ens.fr> References: <3BFE97B3.91430FB1@wanadoo.fr> <3C058126.36357A00@acm.org> <3C067EC8.F10BC9D2@acm.org> X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1007148476 mail2news:4126 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!mulga.cs.mu.oz.au X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) X-Newsreader: Flrn (0.5.0pre0 - 10/00) Lines: 21 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:8386 Pete Becker wrote: > Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >> >> Certainly, it is doable. But then, the same argument applies for >> checking that no object of an abstract class can be created. Are you >> also arguing that that feature solves a non-problem? >> > > No, that's not part of this discussion. So you are for the stato-quo, because it's the statu-quo, and against changes, because they are changes. --�VB --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.research.att.com/~austern/csc/faq.html ]