From -7160822565494088690 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,924f354765fe932a X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-17 13:13:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Francis Glassborow Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: constructor calls in vectors Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 20:12:20 GMT Organization: Southfield Microcomputer SS Approved: Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++ Message-ID: References: <3CE543B6.1040209@acm.org> Reply-To: Francis Glassborow X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1021666345 mail2news:9958 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!mulga.cs.mu.oz.au X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed User-Agent: Turnpike/6.01-U () Lines: 22 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:11350 In article <3CE543B6.1040209@acm.org>, James Dennett writes >The standard behaviour is to use the copy constructor to initialize >the elements of the vector. Any library that uses the default >constructor repeatedly is non-conforming. While I know that is the normal behaviour, where does the standard require it? -- Francis Glassborow ACCU 64 Southfield Rd Oxford OX4 1PA +44(0)1865 246490 All opinions are mine and do not represent those of any organisation --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]