From -6957075575752220375
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,ab08a3e89d74b8d7
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-17 09:40:01 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: "Garry Lancaster" <glancaster@ntlworld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Core Language Active Issue #329
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:39:42 GMT
Organization: ntlworld News Service
Approved: Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>, moderator of comp.std.c++
Message-ID: <9u4F8.7947$Iv.1281492@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
References: <3CD19D55.1050804@mail.com> <x9PA8.1887$9W4.932959@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com> <3CD6A00D.2080502@mail.com> <o5dC8.499$1r.48797@news8-gui.server.ntli.net> <3CD99A77.2040301@mail.com> <L1OC8.11982$xb4.1942040@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com> <3CE005FD.6070400@mail.com> <CFyE8.1187$SY1.95268@news8-gui.server.ntli.net> <3CE2C734.4030703@mail.com> <XKKE8.309$Fs2.22659@news8-gui.server.ntli.net> <3CE4174C.5090209@mail.com>
X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1021653587 mail2news:8274 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!mulga.cs.mu.oz.au
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:57:25 BST
Lines: 33
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:11333

Garry Lancaster wrote:
> > On the contrary, since the current standard-mandated
> > behaviour is scarce in reality, this gives a lot more
> > freedom to change the standard without affecting
> > real existing code.

Hyman Rosen:
> But compiler implementations change much more quickly than
> compiler standards.

And in this respect, according to the defect report, they
are changing *away* from the standard behaviour.

> Furthermore, libraries are now being
> written that depend upon the most subtle nuances of the C++
> standard in order to do template metaprogramming.

Of course, if there were even one serious library that
relied on this behaviour, that would argue against a
change. I don't know of any myself.

Kind regards

Garry Lancaster
Codemill Ltd
Visit our web site at http://www.codemill.net

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]



