From 2399292297095879876 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,5be30c38f618a07b X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-24 11:34:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!skynet.be!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: remove.haberg@matematik.su.se (Hans Aberg) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Why switch w/ only integral types? Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 18:33:44 GMT Organization: Mathematics Approved: Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++ Message-ID: References: <6ee7d287.0203202005.63e0b7b3@posting.google.com> <3CCE6310.672E55DF@webmaster.com> <3CED0FA3.1050102@mail.com> <3CEE4814.3070102@mail.com> X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1022265235 mail2news:1238 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!mulga.cs.mu.oz.au X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 18:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 20 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:11495 In article <3CEE4814.3070102@mail.com>, Hyman Rosen wrote: >> The proposed construct seems a lot more readable and concise than your >> solution. That's one reason why. >Ugh. Fortunately, there is no chance that this construct >or anything like it will be added to C++. Why? Hans Aberg * Anti-spam: remove "remove." from email address. * Email: Hans Aberg * Home Page: * AMS member listing: --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]