From 8498633965609021931
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,5be30c38f618a07b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-28 13:10:01 PST
Return-Path: <devnull@stump.algebra.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
Message-ID: <3CF3D9B6.1000808@mail.com>
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Why switch w/ only integral types?
References: <6ee7d287.0203202005.63e0b7b3@posting.google.com> <qfpm8.12422$cy2.680922353@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> <3CCE6310.672E55DF@webmaster.com> <remove.haberg-2305020021200001@du134-226.ppp.su-anst.tninet.se> <3CED0FA3.1050102@mail.com> <slrnaeqpn1.sg.news_comp.std.c++_expires-2002-07-01@nightrunner.nmhq.net> <3CEE4814.3070102@mail.com> <remove.haberg-2405022017330001@du131-226.ppp.su-anst.tninet.se> <3CEE94AC.4060302@mail.com> <remove.haberg-2405022333100001@du129-226.ppp.su-anst.tninet.se> <3CF1A84E.4070406@mail.com> <remove.haberg-2805021404590001@du128-226.ppp.su-anst.tninet.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@mosquito.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-Trace: 1022613949 reader2.ash.ops.us.uu.net 16206 204.253.250.10
Approved: Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>, moderator of comp.std.c++
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 15:09:40 CST
Lines: 26
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:11622

Hans Aberg wrote:
> It seems me that you posts contains some contradictions, as you said
> something to the effect that are not a member of the committee, but wanted
> to join just in order to ensure that the proposal should not be accepted.

There was a smiley on that.

> In my experience, when one sees highly emotional statements like "the C++
> committee will do this or that", one can be pretty sure that is used in
> order to hide away the fact that there are no real underlying factual
> arguments.

That's not a highly emotional statement, just my opinion about what
is likely to happen, based on what I have seen on this newsgroup for
many years. A highly emotional statement would go something like this:
"The cases statement is an abortion that could only have been designed
by a Visual Basic programmer, and a dumb one at that. If the committee
ever allows such a thing, I'm going to switch to writing all my programs
in J# and never use C++ again." See the difference?

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]



