From 3054174546475621425 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,4441c5f6d7843223 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-13 13:47:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: John Nagle Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: C++0x Wish List (explicit class) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:45:59 GMT Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com Approved: Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++ Message-ID: <3D596DE5.5090201@animats.com> References: <3D48C729.40503@spamnot.codeweavers.com> <8c8b368d.0208060921.43e9e9d5@posting.google.com> <8c8b368d.0208120553.1e2b6a8e@posting.google.com> <8c8b368d.0208130527.3714ac3c@posting.google.com> X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1029271563 mail2news:2088 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!mulga.cs.mu.oz.au X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) Delivered-To: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:34:33 EDT X-UserInfo1: Q[R_PJSCOHVORR\XOBNBNFTBTR\B@GXLN@GZ_GYO^ZUDUWYAKVUOPCW[ML\JXUCKVFDYZKBMSFX^OMSAFNTINTDDMVW[X\THOPXZRVOCJTUTPC\_JSBVX\KAOTBAJBVMZTYAKMNLDI_MFDSSOLXINH__FS^\WQGHGI^C@E[A_CF\AQLDQ\BTMPLDFNVUQ_VM Lines: 29 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:13230 Adam H. Peterson wrote: > "Randy Maddox" wrote in message > news:8c8b368d.0208130527.3714ac3c@posting.google.com... > >>"Adam H. Peterson" wrote in message >> > news:... > >>>I'll take the counter-argument. Which looks cleaner to you? >>> >>>class Complicated1 : noncopyable {}; I'd be fine with that if you could write class nocopyable such that you got a coherent message at compile time if you tried to do a copy. Someone pointed out that Boost's "noncopyable" can result in a copyable subclass, so there's apparently a problem. John Nagle Animats --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]