From -8527139043999353973
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,96a8c01f7043c2d9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-10 13:27:46 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!devnull
From: glancaster@ntlworld.com ("Garry Lancaster")
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Proposal: exception stack unwinding resumption
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:27:46 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: ntlworld News Service
Lines: 20
Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++)
Message-ID: <m8kf9.1153$Ds6.41001@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net>
References: <6df0c6a8.0208260746.633710cb@posting.google.com> <zllb9.458$S51.25977@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net> <6df0c6a8.0209030656.249192ce@posting.google.com> <tHkd9.24180$5g6.553497@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net> <6df0c6a8.0209051026.5df687db@posting.google.com> <ar_e9.1193$Yc7.36404@newsfep2-gui>
X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1031689666 13397 10.0.0.1 (10 Sep 2002 20:27:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:27:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Received: from mulga.cs.mu.oz.au ([128.250.1.22])
	by news.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 17orbt-0003Tw-00
	for mail2news@news.news.demon.net; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:27:45 +0000
X-Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU
	id GAA06972; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 06:27:12 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
X-Delivered-To: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu
X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:50:58 BST
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:13763

I should have written:

> If you have a particular cleanup sequence you are
> having trouble implementing *with* a no-throw
> destructor, you could post it here [actually, probably
> more appropriate on comp.lang.c++.moderated],
> although the solution will likely be along the lines
> already discussed.

Sorry about that.

- Garry Lancaster.


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]



