From -8125315023242099958
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,96a8c01f7043c2d9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-23 10:05:48 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!devnull
From: francis.glassborow@ntlworld.com (Francis Glassborow)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Proposal: exception stack unwinding resumption
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Southfield Microcomputer SS
Lines: 21
Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++)
Message-ID: <+BUqU3G8b0j9Ewzr@robinton.demon.co.uk>
References: <6df0c6a8.0208260746.633710cb@posting.google.com>
 <TbHf9.859$Pa7.63089@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net>
 <6df0c6a8.0209121133.6f081c37@posting.google.com>
 <e6jg9.4504$7x3.204560@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net>
 <23b84d65.0209161107.23bea618@posting.google.com>
 <6df0c6a8.0209170602.2cb54634@posting.google.com>
 <RW_h9.899$nU2.53545@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net>
 <6df0c6a8.0209201925.6faa9e57@posting.google.com>
 <c87c1cfb.0209220939.46d823af@posting.google.com>
 <6df0c6a8.0209230602.2aba3ca8@posting.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1032800747 29599 10.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2002 17:05:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Received: from mulga.cs.mu.oz.au ([128.250.1.22])
	by news.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 17tWeM-0007hF-00
	for mail2news@news.news.demon.net; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:05:46 +0000
X-Received: by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU
	id DAA08512; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 03:04:57 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
X-Delivered-To: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu
X-Reply-To: Francis Glassborow <francisG@robinton.demon.co.uk>
X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
X-User-Agent: Turnpike/6.01-U (<TilyaeicE$WmMOP9F8P4$y3lmP>)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:14138

In article <6df0c6a8.0209230602.2aba3ca8@posting.google.com>, Pierre 
Baillargeon <pierrebai@hotmail.com> writes
>Tell me, what do you do in your destructors to have them not throw?

I simply do not call functions that can throw. If I am mistaken my code 
is clearly seriously broken, a fact that I would want to know about 
rather than letting it carry on and reek havoc.


-- 
Francis Glassborow      ACCU
64 Southfield Rd
Oxford OX4 1PA          +44(0)1865 246490
All opinions are mine and do not represent those of any organisation

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]



