From -1425652554141157069 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,63bd4d2f16a52bf0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-03 14:16:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!devnull From: vAbazarov@dAnai.com ("Victor Bazarov") Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Exception specification for overriding functions Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 22:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Lines: 26 Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++) Message-ID: References: <3DC55CDA.614CF737@purdue.edu> X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1036361808 25170 10.0.0.1 (3 Nov 2002 22:16:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 22:16:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Received: from mulga.cs.mu.oz.au ([128.250.1.22]) by news.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 188T30-0006Xn-00 for mail2news@news.news.demon.net; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 22:16:47 +0000 X-Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU id JAA09326; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:16:34 +1100 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) X-Delivered-To: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=NOSPAM_INC,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:15092 "Avi Kak" wrote... > Which clause of the standard (14882-1998) describes the > restrictions on the exception specifications for an > overriding function in a derived class vis-a-vis the > exception specification for the overridden function in > a base class? 15.4 (paragraph 3) > I have scanned through the material dealing with derived > classes (clause 10) of the standard, but have not seen > any mention of the restrictions I am looking for. Chapter 15 is a separate chapter that deals with exceptions. Victor -- Please remove capital A's from my address when replying by mail --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]