From -3785158644047260279 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,7b8ff869fe5b7ef5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-25 18:13:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!devnull From: francis@robinton.demon.co.uk (Francis Glassborow) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: compilers that implement the keyword 'export' Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 02:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Southfield Microcomputer SS Lines: 31 Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++) Message-ID: References: <3cad08b8.0311171811.2760c086@posting.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1069812821 1386 10.0.0.1 (26 Nov 2003 02:13:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 02:13:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Received: from mulga.cs.mu.oz.au ([128.250.1.22]) by news.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AOpBU-0000M4-00 for mail2news@news.news.demon.net; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 02:13:41 +0000 X-Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU id NAA20598; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:13:36 +1100 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) X-Delivered-To: std-c++@ucar.edu X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ X-User-Agent: Turnpike/6.02-U () X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_01,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,USER_AGENT version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:515 In article , Ekkehard Morgenstern writes > >"Razmig K" schrieb im Newsbeitrag >news:3cad08b8.0311171811.2760c086@posting.google.com... >> please name any recent C++ compiler that can handle 'export'ing >> templates for effective separate compilation. >> Thank you. > >IBM Visual Age for C++ V3.5 (AFAIK doesn't work on Windows 2000 and XP) and >V4.0 (which entirely eliminates isolated module compliation). And as such is non-conforming and cannot be made to conform. That is not to say that I do not like the approach that was taken by IBM, just that it will always result in code that can behave differently from the way specified by the C++ Standard. > >I don't know if the compiler is still manufactured or supported, or for >which platforms. -- Francis Glassborow ACCU If you are not using up-to-date virus protection you should not be reading this. Viruses do not just hurt the infected but the whole community. --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]