From 3228775570465314506 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,e32b36c77828df8b X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-05 19:00:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!devnull From: pasa@lib.hu ("Balog Pal") Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Add My Idea to the C++ Compiler Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 03:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Organization: LiB Lines: 22 Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++) Message-ID: <3ff96a8c@andromeda.datanet.hu> References: X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 1073358026 3163 10.0.0.1 (6 Jan 2004 03:00:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 03:00:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Received: from mulga.cs.mu.oz.au ([128.250.1.22]) by news.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AdhSC-0000os-00 for mail2news@news.news.demon.net; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 03:00:25 +0000 X-Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU id OAA03457; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:00:19 +1100 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) X-Delivered-To: std-c++@ucar.edu X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4922.1500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_01,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,REFERENCES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.std.c++:815 ""Bryan Parkoff"" wrote in message news:K0uHb.25610$V23.21669@fe1.texas.rr.com... Is your only motivation to this whole to replace some CALLs with JMPs? Can you show us some profiler data that compares the run times of your design vs. the traditional way? IMHO if you can show a 2-fold speed gain probably someone will consider to think about your article. However if data shows below-measurable difference, or a slowdown [for what (the latter two summed) I see 99.999% probability], you may reconsider it's usefullness yourself. Paul --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]