From -6641416506767723937 X-Google-Thread: f78e5,6f042a6ff823c6a0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!stump.algebra.com!devnull From: v.Abazarov@comAcast.net (Victor Bazarov) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Relation of enermy(anti-friend) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:22:47 GMT Organization: NTT/VERIO Lines: 31 Sender: mail2news@demon.net Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: news.news.demon.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1093551773 530 158.152.254.254 (26 Aug 2004 20:22:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:22:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) X-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64-mulga_r1 (2004-01-11) on mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64-mulga_r1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail X-Received: (from fjh@localhost) by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id i7QKMmNr020923; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 06:22:48 +1000 (EST) X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 19:34:49 GMT X-Delivered-To: std-c++@ucar.edu X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:2209 Kim, Seungtai wrote: > May be it just funny question. > > The friend makes that a function or class can access to > invisible memebers with particular right. It works well for > operator <<, >>, etc. > > In this point, the question arises. Why there is no enemy relation. > Enermy relation means that a class or a function even can not see > the public member of a enermy class if they are tied with enermy > relation. > > [...] > I thinks that this kinds of relation are easily arised in real situation. Have you encountered anything _in the real life_ that would be resolved by introducing the "enemy" specifier? I haven't. > Is there already consideration occured? If not, why this relation > dose not considered in the Standard or... Because it's not needed, probably. V --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]