From -2387648233071184068 X-Google-Thread: f78e5,e1d72e3830635ee X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.speakeasy.net!news.speakeasy.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:10:04 -0500 Return-Path: X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) Delivered-To: std-c++@ucar.edu From: Maciej Sobczak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: std::tolower - which one should be visible? References: <1122301061.460975.257060@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.77.196.202 Message-ID: <42e55374$1_3@news.bluewin.ch> Organization: Bluewin AG Complaints-To: abuse@bluewin.ch X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ucar.edu X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU Approved: Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++ X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:06:40 CST Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.182.171.162 X-Trace: sv3-eCJmE/W2BTrlkLfFofpaOymTwnguCE+TpvEXlw8OKpEBuoTZMjaehT+1AHhcbD+hziPYampimrM3VCz!tfiyg8A2g8swBeNb59JLgxIeWbVZGTvFdB6aJYSld7dn+2XeWgWG47P6zuxUvRS73JzyvBJkwHEq!I4AaKsoLMQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@speakeasy.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@speakeasy.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:1485 kanze@gabi-soft.fr wrote: > Except that calling the standard C version of tolower with a > char argument is undefined behavior, of course. I don't understand this assertion. The argument of C version of tolower has to be representable by unsigned char or equal to EOF. Staying within the ASCII range [0..127], all character codes seem to fit this requirement. What's the real problem? -- Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/ Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/ --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]