From 5823734239686395051
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,52112cea9d2ccd4a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!easynet-monga!easynet.net!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!stump.algebra.com!devnull
From: hyrosen@mail.com (Hyman Rosen)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=A75=2E2=2E2/8_unspecified_evluation_od?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?er=3F?=
Date: Tue,  2 Aug 2005 19:52:26 GMT
Lines: 14
Sender: mail2news@demon.net
Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++)
Message-ID: <200508021944.j72JiHuC098353@horus.isnic.is>
References: <CsidnX1xcd4C73_fRVn-tA@speakeasy.net>
 <42E4EB01.9020700@alumina.nl> <42E64CCE.7030708@cs.york.ac.uk>
 <42E68BDD.1050701@alumina.nl>
 <1122649512.879866.38000@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <3l12o0F10nuusU1@individual.net> <0RfHe.2500$%a2.1721@trndny03>
 <IKJyCD.1Cz2@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
 <1122984019.538752.167550@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <42efc9c2$0$720$5fc3050@dreader2.news.tiscali.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.news.demon.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1123012354 27119 158.152.254.254 (2 Aug 2005 19:52:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 19:52:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
X-User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU
X-Received: (from fjh@localhost)
	by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id j72JqQDp006047;
	Wed, 3 Aug 2005 05:52:26 +1000 (EST)
X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail
X-Delivered-To: std-c++@ucar.edu
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:1614

Marc Schoolderman wrote:
> It's probably constructive to get implementations to support it before 
> arguing in favor of inclusion in a next standard.

What for? We already know that compilers can sequence
things in the proper order, because they do it for
statements.

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]



