From 5445092384887303197
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,d9fe358a73c69991
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.speakeasy.net!news.speakeasy.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:40:17 -0500
Return-Path: <devnull@stump.algebra.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
Delivered-To: std-c++@ucar.edu
From: "Wu Yongwei" <wuyongwei@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Should failure to instantiate a function template abort compilation during overload resolution?
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1123728242.818514.246510@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1123485075.096196.242990@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <hinnant-6B7192.21000609082005@syrcnyrdrs-03-ge0.nyroc.rr.com>
   <1123642375.849913.19940@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <m1y87axamn.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=211.152.42.2;
   posting-account=YpX4bQ0AAABQX3uC3kY4dsrVfN1inbmo
X-Greylisting: NO DELAY (Relay+Sender autoqualified);
	processed by UCSD_GL-v2.1 on mailbox7.ucsd.edu;
	Wed, 10 August 2005 19:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spamscanner: mailbox7.ucsd.edu  (v1.6 Aug  4 2005 15:27:38, -2.8/5.0 3.0.4)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 99482 j7B2i7JP008350 mailbox7.ucsd.edu)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ucar.edu
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Approved: Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>, moderator of comp.std.c++
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:32:49 CST
Lines: 32
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.182.171.162
X-Trace: sv3-SvkIK4WfgJ777CJAD5NQpNcxp+8NMt3kxa4CtnTsvhQqd/7yIYjpOJvoJBUCEZMLVyAOKNxLdpxswj1!aZLZOEIKWwazSD8E3VNk2Wb7X63m+8g82Bd+2v9iRkHbpTUpIUxzxPT0vUIXYsJchz2ZwtM27X7Z!0nu8Fly9L2c35JiqPCBHLLs6EVsYr5wbCnwwrw5E8CE=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@speakeasy.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@speakeasy.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:1760

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> "Wu Yongwei" <wuyongwei@gmail.com> writes:
> | Thanks for your informatiom.  Do you think this is the way to go?  I
> | mean, does anyone in the C++ committee realize that it might be a
>
> The C++ committee realizes that uncontrolled argument dependent name
> lookup causes problems in some circumstances.  The proper fix seems
> unclear however.  Many people have different opinions about what the
> fix should be. For the latests, google for "a modest proposal" and
> "Herb Sutter", and the latest concept papers.

Thanks for this useful info.

> | defect in the Standard that violates the rationale of the std namespace
>
> The issue has nothing specific to do with namespace std.  I would have
> considered it a problem was the namespace called foobar and the
> function called freebies.

Yes, you are right.  But logically my statement was not wrong either.
:-)

Best regards,

Yongwei

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]



