From -4260813477212843984
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,574518e5c7a60feb
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!stump.algebra.com!devnull
From: public@marlowa.plus.com (Andrew Marlow)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Revised Allocator Proposal
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:49:46 GMT
Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net)
Lines: 18
Sender: mail2news@demon.net
Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++)
Message-ID: <pan.2005.08.29.15.57.18.316344@marlowa.plus.com>
References: <7ibbe1hu4omoqsfibanas46idf9u6i5hjo@4ax.com> <r5msg19kp6bearr4j87ijafhjgqafpd62r@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.news.demon.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1125341397 29238 158.152.254.254 (29 Aug 2005 18:49:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:49:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
X-User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU
X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail
X-Received: (from fjh@localhost)
	by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id j7TInkdk026237;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:49:46 +1000 (EST)
X-Delivered-To: std-c++@ucar.edu
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:1971

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:16:11 -0600, Pablo Halpern wrote:

> I want to thank everybody for their feedback on my proposal.
> Today I posted a second revision at
> http://home.earthlink.net/~phalpern/cpp/HalpernAllocatorProposal.pdf.  I
> also formally submitted it to the Library WG for consideration in the
> meeting next month.

It is not clear to me exactly why wherever you have an allocator parameter
it tends to be a pointer rather than a reference. Why is that please? Will
the proposal specify what the behaviour is when the pointer is null?

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]



