From -8686570891256242345 X-Google-Thread: f78e5,174aa7b34b06a51 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!news-mue1.dfn.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!stump.algebra.com!devnull From: ark@acm.org ("Andrew Koenig") Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Is this really unspecified behavior? Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:52:04 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Lines: 19 Sender: mail2news@demon.net Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++) Message-ID: References: <1132629737.664847.151630@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <1132662585.882464.24110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: news.news.demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1132725156 17644 158.152.254.254 (23 Nov 2005 05:52:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:52:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Priority: 3 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Received: (from fjh@localhost) by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id jAN5q4lR001009; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:52:04 +1100 (EST) X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:37:43 GMT X-Delivered-To: std-c++@ucar.edu X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:2578 "Hyman Rosen" wrote in message news:E1EeZw5-0004wI-00@chx400.switch.ch... > kuyper@wizard.net wrote: > Specifying order of evaluation completely in C++ would > be completely backwards-compatible with C, though, so > that's no excuse here. The trouble is that if order of evaluation were completely specified in C++, there might be C++ compilers that would be required to give different results from existing C implementations for the same program (assuming, of course, that the program was in the intersection of C and C++). --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]