From 5463093237112314348
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,174aa7b34b06a51
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.speakeasy.net!news.speakeasy.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:00:01 -0600
Return-Path: <devnull@stump.algebra.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
Delivered-To: std-c++@ucar.edu
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
Subject: Re: Is this really unspecified behavior?
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
References: <1132629737.664847.151630@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <1132662585.882464.24110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
 <E1EeZw5-0004wI-00@chx400.switch.ch>
 <XBQgf.150724$zb5.113482@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <1132809799.629407.12230@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
 <15phf.161544$zb5.145459@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Message-Id: <20051125144435.31EA211406E@mscan6.ucar.edu>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ucar.edu
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Approved: Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>, moderator of comp.std.c++
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:56:40 CST
Lines: 17
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.182.171.162
X-Trace: sv3-IEnzknlEZCkOL2zxau4SpPnHusnP4P5t9dO4xAyZ5UvMeYyAsqMyUElqsIcC3FK528fc/DiR4u0VowI!0gixClZPrGJOLCpSWV17Gdy7WK1+vyBX1pLEVyZBW4jXqB8Ih7uR4Xj1mNDOCUrPfz2jdEup1h/Z!DqTMzQfrGAIRxNsci6Mn4bzvXTdf
X-Complaints-To: abuse@speakeasy.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@speakeasy.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:2597

Andrew Koenig wrote:
> Part of the point is to be able to translate a C++ expression into the 
> equivalent C expression without changing its meaning.

Since when? Certainly there was a goal that C code should
carry forward into C++ with its meaning generally unchanged,
but why would anyone care about going the other way? And if
that is what you want, you have to avoid all sorts of C++
constructs anyway, so you would just avoid C-ambiguous
expressions as well.

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]



