From 5653484003842923360
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,174aa7b34b06a51
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!stump.algebra.com!devnull
From: SeeWebsiteForEmail@moderncppdesign.com ("Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website For Email)")
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Is this really unspecified behavior?
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:52:33 GMT
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 27
Sender: mail2news@demon.net
Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++)
Message-ID: <Irs2sp.C4J@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
References: <1132759176.368850.264850@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>	<H1phf.161529$zb5.99785@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>	<1132933832.802917.153350@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>	<1133551647.532929.325730@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>	<1133583412.951239.208510@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>	<E1EjGBD-0005T8-00@chx400.switch.ch>	<1133910546.716987.80030@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>	<E1EjzL6-0006ic-00@chx400.switch.ch>	<0l5ep1ppfhdj5p1pcu7e4na4ub0vjajlq3@4ax.com>	<IrIz47.GnJ"@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <u
	<IroCFv.1H5p@beaver.cs.washington.edu>	<87oe3e8e0c.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <Mirpf.780$kb1.670@trndny09>	<IrqFvJ.D85@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <87fyop6yyz.fsf@boost-consulting.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.news.demon.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1135057974 3755 158.152.254.254 (20 Dec 2005 05:52:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:52:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: parakeet.ee.washington.edu
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
X-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Thunderbird/1.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU
X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail
X-Received: (from fjh@localhost)
	by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id jBK5qX8t010639;
	Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:52:33 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:2853

David Abrahams wrote:
> SeeWebsiteForEmail@moderncppdesign.com ("Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website For Email)") writes:
>>Very nice! And to that I'd add: "Programs must be written for people
>>to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute" - Abelson and
>>Sussman.
> 
> 
> Oh, I'm _very_ big on that one.  I don't think decorating all the
> high-performance numerics code with some "allow unordered evaluation"
> construct is a good way to keep them readable, though.

I work with (and hack into) a high-performance math package (the 
QuickNet neural network library) a daily basis. For that library, 
unordered evaluation would not be useful.

Please show examples taken from real high-performance numeric code where 
  unordered evaluation would make a difference.


Andrei

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]



