From -7209630075978092856 X-Google-Thread: f78e5,e0420ef247a8cf1c X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!194.159.246.34.MISMATCH!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!stump.algebra.com!devnull From: pchapin@sover.net ("Peter C. Chapin") Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Modules for C++? Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:44:23 GMT Organization: Kelsey Mountain Software Lines: 23 Sender: mail2news@demon.net Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++) Message-ID: References: <1150708440.004686.63000@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: news.news.demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1150775072 3689 158.152.254.254 (20 Jun 2006 03:44:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:44:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: std-c++@mailman.ucar.edu X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) X-User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 X-Greylisting: NO DELAY (Relay+Sender autoqualified); processed by UCSD_GL-v2.1 on mailbox7.ucsd.edu; Mon, 19 June 2006 19:22:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.mu.OZ.AU X-Received: (from fjh@localhost) by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id k5K3iNFh011012; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:44:23 +1000 (EST) X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail X-Delivered-To: std-c++@mailman.ucar.edu X-Spamscanner: mailbox7.ucsd.edu (v1.6 Aug 4 2005 15:27:38, -2.8/5.0 3.0.4) X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 12408 k5K2Lx61017720 mailbox7.ucsd.edu) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.std.c++:2426 "kanze" wrote in news:1150708440.004686.63000 @r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: > The proposal, at least as I read it, is very concrete. At the > April meeting, the committee voted to encourage the author to > continue to develop it; there seems to be more or less a > consensus that something along these lines would be nice. > > On the other hand, there doesn't seem to be anyone with enough > time to implement a proof of concept for it. And without at > least one working implementation before the finalization of the > standard, I can't imagine it being accepted. Thanks for your comments. Peter --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]