From -8914478362564973721
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,c9a289c55d59e43d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!stump.algebra.com!devnull
From: fgothamNO@SPAM.com (Frederick Gotham)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: non-type template parameter in the new std.
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:17:08 GMT
Organization: Eircom.Net http://www.eircom.net
Lines: 31
Sender: mail2news@demon.net
Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++)
Message-ID: <tB4vg.11594$j7.319888@news.indigo.ie>
References: <1152697717.720355.314370@35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1152726032.559269.324790@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0607162111540.16205@sun> <CsKug.11531$j7.319719@news.indigo.ie> <QfOug.3685$lv.534@fed1read12> <IKOug.11557$j7.319801@news.indigo.ie> <yQYug.3713$lv.1638@fed1read12>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.news.demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1153235833 29797 158.152.254.254 (18 Jul 2006 15:17:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:17:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: std-c++@mailman.ucar.edu
X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov)
X-User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at csse.unimelb.edu.au
X-Received: (from fjh@localhost)
	by mulga.csse.unimelb.edu.au (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id k6IFH8Qd015221;
	Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:17:08 +1000 (EST)
X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail
X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:36:41 BST
X-Delivered-To: std-c++@mailman.ucar.edu
X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.csse.unimelb.edu.au: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f
X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.std.c++:2829

James Dennett posted:

> Most would agree that the many uses of "static" in C and C++
> are an example of *poor* use of a keyword; such terminology
> and overloading leads to much confusion.  Are you perchance
> arguing for my side of this debate?


No.

You know how a parrot can't speak English, yet it will actually speak 
intelligible English. It hasn't got a clue what it's saying; it doesn't put 
any thought into its words -- all it does is produce sounds.

Well that's how I treat keywords; I don't put any thought into them, I just 
treat them as a sequence of characters.

I will always favour shorter keywords over longer keywords; hence I'll never 
write "typename T" instead of "class T".


-- 

Frederick Gotham

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]



