From -5242212924234718577 X-Google-Thread: f78e5,57f37be32367f817 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!stump.algebra.com!devnull From: gdr@cs.tamu.edu (Gabriel Dos Reis) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Defect report: [dcl.constexpr]/5 constexpr and templates Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 00:33:50 GMT Organization: Texas A&M University- College Station, TX, USA Lines: 30 Sender: mail2news@demon.net Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson , moderator of comp.std.c++) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: news.news.demon.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1194309234 23338 158.152.254.254 (6 Nov 2007 00:33:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 00:33:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: std-c++@mailman.ucar.edu X-Robomod: STUMP, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at csse.unimelb.edu.au X-Received: (from fjh@localhost) by mulga.csse.unimelb.edu.au (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id lA60Xo6Y029917; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 11:33:50 +1100 (EST) X-Path: comp-std-cpp-robomod!not-for-mail X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:36:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Delivered-To: std-c++@mailman.ucar.edu X-Authentication-Warning: mulga.csse.unimelb.edu.au: fjh set sender to devnull@stump.algebra.com using -f X-SMTP-Auth: no X-Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:9542 On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Alberto Ganesh Barbati wrote: | Such use of the term "function template" is not consistent with the use | established in clause 14 (see in particular 14.7/2, 14.7/3). however, it is coherent with 14.8 and other parts of the standard text. | | While I agree that the term "function template" might be stretched to | also include member function templates, including members of a class | template is IMHO a bit too far, and AFAIK it would be the first time in | the standard that such a thing would be made. | | Just my opinion, So, in your opinion, section 14.8 does not apply to member function templates? -- Dr. Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr@cs.tamu.edu), Assistant Professor http://www.cs.tamu.edu/people/faculty/gdr Texas A&M University -- Department of Computer Science 301, Bright Building -- College Station, TX 77843-3112 --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]