From 1578959326944711691 X-Google-Thread: 7894ca11fe,d47b345505a72a70 X-Google-Attributes: gid7894ca11fe,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.alt.net!frodo.cs.rpi.edu!not-for-mail From: Hyman Rosen Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: for-else: adding else to for loops Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:45:11 CST Organization: unknown Lines: 19 Sender: cppmods@cs.rpi.edu Approved: james.dennett@gmail.com Message-ID: References: <5d82cd6c-2a22-4dd7-8c7d-790b579533ea@d15g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <9e9c2ca5-78eb-460c-adec-2ec051c54210@r18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <999e529c-49b8-4e86-a9de-aa6a545289aa@a26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: netlab.cs.rpi.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed To: (Usenet) Return-Path: X-Original-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:31:44 -0400 X-Submission-Address: std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.std.c++:1309 James Kanze wrote: > > A native supporting syntax for what? I haven't yet figured out > what the OP wants (except maybe another tool for obfuscation). Providing control flow after loop exit which distinguishes between the loop having exited because its test condition was false and the loop having exited through a break (and in my syntax, also for the loop never having been executed). Without special syntax, you wind up with additional boolean variables or with repeated tests or with deeply indented code. -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]