From 362519402866598596 X-Google-Thread: 7894ca11fe,d47b345505a72a70 X-Google-Attributes: gid7894ca11fe,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!news.alt.net!frodo.cs.rpi.edu!not-for-mail From: Hyman Rosen Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: for-else: adding else to for loops Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:36:23 CST Organization: unknown Lines: 15 Sender: cppmods@cs.rpi.edu Approved: stephen.clamage@sun.com Message-ID: References: <5d82cd6c-2a22-4dd7-8c7d-790b579533ea@d15g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <9e9c2ca5-78eb-460c-adec-2ec051c54210@r18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: netlab.cs.rpi.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed To: (Usenet) Return-Path: X-Original-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:28:50 -0400 X-Submission-Address: std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.std.c++:1293 Ron wrote: > the language does not need any more horrendous structure violations The required code flow is the required code flow, whether the language supports its expression directly or not. Implementing the same flow by adding additional boolean variables or repeating tests doesn't necessarily improve the readability of the code. -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]