From -823460910844501557 X-Google-Thread: f78e5,cc5f8341523fbc66,start X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid7894ca11fe,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.alt.net!frodo.cs.rpi.edu!not-for-mail From: "Johannes Schaub (litb)" Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: FCD issue: Contradiction about dependency of "operator T()" Followup-To: comp.std.c++ Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:28:46 CST Organization: T-Online Lines: 26 Sender: cppmods@cs.rpi.edu Approved: james.dennett@gmail.com Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: netlab.cs.rpi.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" To: (Usenet) Return-Path: X-Original-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:29:24 +0200 X-Submission-Address: std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.std.c++:2918 The FCD changed the text of 14.7.2/1 about the Status of dependency of a function call to read like "In an expression of the form: postfix-expression ( expression-list[opt] ) where the postfix-expression is an unqualified-id , the unqualified-id denotes a dependent name if and only if any of the expressions in the expression-list is a type-dependent expression (14.7.2.2)." This rule contradicts 14.7.2.2/3 which says "An id-expression is type-dependent if it contains: - a conversion-function-id that specifies a dependent type," Since the time frame for FCD issue reports is over, i'm not sure where i should send this issue to. -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]